The Feedback Trap(s)

One of the many debts I owe to Ron Larsen is the day he handed me a study taken of John Wooden’s feedback. The study codified Wooden’s coaching and linked it to the actions of his players in order to judge it’s effectiveness. It was an eye-opening paper for me. I marveled at how remarkably rigid Wooden was in adhering to the laws of learning when he spoke.

Here are some things the researchers showed:

– short, oft-repeated phrases (he spoke in keys)

– precise physical demonstrations alongside what he was describing (goal presentation)

– Rarely, if ever, stopping practice (maximum # of reps always a priority)

– The Wooden Sandwich: A positive image, an image of the error that just occurred, concluding with a positive image (kin esthetic, visual and auditory learning simultaneously)

– Lots of information and demands for focus and effort. No belittling character or personal attacks. (“I care about you, and here’s how you get better”)

It’s easy to see if we always spoke in this manner, we’d have pretty successful practices. So, why don’t we do it all the time? Here are some traps we sometimes set for ourselves;

1. The Perception Trap: Sometimes we deliver feedback that is more for ourselves than for our athletes. When this happens, our motivation for what we’re saying is coming from a disingenuous place, which can alienate the athlete and prevent learning from occurring. The more we do this, the more time we’re wasting and the further we’re distancing ourselves from our players.

The perception trap happens when we say things so people can acknowledge how smart we are, or how good a public speaker we are, or how tough we are, or how talented we are (or were), or how badly we want them to like us. While people can make assumptions, in the end, the only one who really knows where the motivation for our statements is coming from is ourselves. Great teachers say things with the athlete’s best interest in mind.

2. Lack of clarity: If we “kind of” know what we want our athletes to do, then we can expect them to “kind of” do it. Our athletes learn best from clear, short, visual statements that will be repeated over and over. Clear vision allows for clear action.

3. Talking way too much: Our mind’s have a limited ability to process information (try to memorize a phone number while replying to an email..) so when we talk for a long time, we’re essentially doing it for ourselves. Our athletes will only remember a small portion of what we’re saying in that moment.

4. Multiple things to work on at the same time: We can often see how far our players’ need to go. We also know the process takes time. Our discipline in having the patience to allow our players to focus on just one thing will go a long way towards them staying motivated and hungry to improve. There is no quicker way to demotivate someone than to overwhelm them.

For me, a great way to get myself out of these traps is to ask for help from my assistants and players, as well as read that wonderful article Ron gave me awhile go. It’s amazing how much Wooden did right.

What traps and solutions have you found in your coaching?

5 comments on The Feedback Trap(s)

  1. Name *Bob Raidl says:

    Comment
    Hi Tom
    Great eye work sequencing at the Seattle clinic. My coaches and I are anxious to start implementing the concepts with the many new players in our program starting Tuesday. Is is possible to get a copy or reference to the Wooden study that you’re mentioning that Ron provided you?

    Thanks

  2. Name * says:

    Bob,

    http://www.probasket.es/Doc_Tec/John%20Wooden.pdf
    You might also find similar studies on Pat Summitt and Jerry Tarkanian to be quite interesting.
    http://sportpsych.mcgill.ca/pdf/publications/Systemic_Observation_Study_1999.pdf
    I haven’t been able to find a link to the Summitt study online, but if your local/university library has access to academic journals, the article is in the “Sport Psychologist”, 2008, V22, I2

    Enjoy!
    Peter Lienert
    Alliance Volleyball Club

  3. Teron Uy says:

    I would highly recommend the book “You Haven’t Taught Until They Have Learned”. It is authored by Swen Nader and ronald Gallimore. Swen Nader was a former player of Wooden’s who never really saw that much playing time. In the book he talks about a lot of things. Here is a list ( not complete ) of things…
    Planning practice,giving feedback, time management, treating people as individuals, learning through research…

    I think it is one of the best books that I have read for coaching.

    -Teron
    Assistant Coach
    Seattle University

  4. Name *tblack says:

    Hey Bob,

    Thanks for your comment. I had a great time with our group up in UW and I really appreciate the thought. Peter, thanks for providing the link!

  5. tblack says:

    Thanks, Teron. I’ll get a copy asap

Comments are closed.